\relax 
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Converting the SKY CCD coordinate to the FPI XY coordinate}{1}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces  The measured sky-camera to FPI coordinate converstion factors. }}{2}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  The measured FPI coordinates of the rotator axis. The shifts of the FPI coordinates reflect the shift of the Echidna against the rotator axis. }}{2}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Rotator axis on the FPI coordinate}{2}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Measuring the movement of the center of the distortion pattern (1)}{2}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces  The relation between the sky camera CCD coordinate, the FPI XY coordinate, and the cerestial coordinate. It should be noted that the SKY camera Y coordinate is flipped on the data and the Echidna GUI window. }}{3}}
\newlabel{FPI_coordinate}{{1}{3}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Measuring the center of the distortion pattern (2)}{3}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  The measured distortion of the corrector lens in 20071224 with rotator angle of $-97$deg. Horizontal axis is the distance from the FPI (0,0) position in arcmin. Vertical axis is the offset from the $0.01240$ (or $0.01237$) arcsec/$\mu $m in arcsec. Left) in Y (or Dec) direction, MAP2-Y and MAP3 results are shown in red and blue, respectively. Ray trace model is shown in green. The model is offsetted by $-0.39$arcmin ($-1.9$mm) to match the observed distortion curve. Right) in X (or RA) direction, MAP2-X and MAP4 results are shown in red and blue, respectively. Ray trace model is shown in green. The model is offsetted by $-0.95$ arcmin ($-4.6$mm). }}{4}}
\newlabel{FPI_coo_distortion}{{2}{4}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces  Summary of the results of the distortion center measurements. }}{4}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces  The measured positions of the distortion pattern center on the FPI coordinate from 200801 engineering observations. The numbers in the figure indicate the ROTATOR\_REAL\_ANGLE during the measurements. The measured distortion centers locate on a circle around the rotator center with radius of 4.444mm (shown with the large circle). The asterisk indicate the best fit position of the distortion center at ROTATOR\_REAL\_ANGLE=0.0. (The direction of the ROTATOR\_REAL\_ANGLE is different from the OFFSET\_ANGLE.)}}{5}}
\newlabel{plot_dist_cen_200801}{{3}{5}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces  The best-fit distortion pattern center at ROTATOR\_REAL\_ANGLE=0.0 compared with the CMM positions. Fitted Dist.Shift.Rot0 shows Dist.Shift.Rot0 determined with equation shown in Sect.4. These Dist.Shift.Rot0 values correspond to telescope.model parameters No.23 and No.24, {\bf  but signs are inverted}. All values are in $\mu $m. Best CMM positions for each observation are marked with asterisk. }}{5}}
\newlabel{CMM0}{{4}{5}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces  The measured positions of the distortion pattern center on the FPI coordinate from 200805 (only two points marked with filled square with large open square) and 200806 engineering observations. 200806 results shown with filled symbols are used for determine the best fit circle. Black, blue, and red symbols represents results with CMM at (4700,-4200), (3200, -4000), and (3700, -4500). The asterisk indicate the best fit position of the distortion center at ROTATOR\_REAL\_ANGLE=0.0. The results of 200801 (shown in the previous figure) are shown with green symbols. }}{6}}
\newlabel{plot_dist_cen}{{4}{6}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces  The distortion model parameters determined for each field. Distortion parameter change which will make $0.1^{\prime \prime }$ difference at the edge of FoV shown as ``Required accuracy''. }}{7}}
\newlabel{distpars}{{5}{7}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces  Measured pointing error for various field, the difference of the RA-DEC coordinate of the rotation center from the target RA-DEC coordinate. Data taken before meridian are marked with open squares. }}{8}}
\newlabel{plot_point_cen}{{5}{8}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Pointing center}{8}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Guide fiber focus positions}{8}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Appendix: calibration items summary}{8}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces  Summary of the best estimate environmental variables for ICS and telescope model parameters related to the distortion pattern modeling. It should be noted that POINTING\_ERR does not relate to the pointing error of the telescope, relate to the offset between the rotator axis and the FPI origin. These values are described in \$ECONFIG/.zshrc and \$ECONFIG/telescope.model }}{9}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces  The relation between the Echidna unit and the PIR/CMM unit at rotator angle of 0 degree. CMM axis is 7.5 degree rotated against Echidna coordnate (measurements by M.Kimura) }}{10}}
\newlabel{FPI_coordinate2}{{6}{10}}